In the evolving landscape of work, we find ourselves at a crossroads between the traditional Return to Office (RTO) model, popular with employers, and Work From Home (WFH), which is popular with employees. Each side presents compelling arguments supported by recent statistics, leading to the emergence of hybrid work models as a potential solution that seeks to balance the needs and preferences of both parties.

The Case for RTO: Employers’ Perspective

Employers advocating for RTO emphasize the importance of collaboration, culture, and oversight. They argue that in-person interactions foster innovation and a sense of belonging among employees. For instance, 74% of Gen Z employees and the same percentage of the broader workforce express a preference for face-to-face interactions and believe that being in-office helps give them a sense of belonging. Despite the push for flexibility, office occupancy has remained relatively unchanged, with 90% of companies planning to return to the office by the end of 2024. This steadfast approach underscores employers’ belief in the office’s role in maintaining operational efficiency and company culture.

However, the transition hasn’t been seamless. Companies like Atlassian faced challenges with team synchronization when allowing employees to work in any time zone, highlighting the complexities of managing a dispersed workforce. Moreover, concerns over tax and workflow issues prompt some employers to reconsider the extent of remote work allowances.

The Case for WFH: Employees’ Perspective

On the flip side, employees have embraced the WFH model for its flexibility, work-life balance, and the personal autonomy it offers. The statistics are telling: 83% of workers globally prefer a hybrid work model, indicating a strong desire for some degree of remote work. Remote job postings, although reduced from their peak in March 2022, still represent a significant portion of the market, with close to half of jobseekers preferring remote roles. The freedom to work away from the office has led to unique work habits, with 46% admitting to taking work calls in bed, and a notable portion even working in less conventional circumstances.

The threat of losing this flexibility is significant, with Deloitte reporting that 66% of remote workers would quit if required to return to the office five days a week. This sentiment is echoed by the drastic step taken by Grindr employees, 45% of whom resigned when asked to return to the office at least two days a week.

Hybrid Work: The Middle Ground

Amidst these contrasting views, hybrid work models emerge as a compelling compromise, offering a blend of in-office collaboration and remote flexibility. The adoption of hybrid models by 96 out of the Fortune 100 companies, with Cisco saving approximately $500 million by reducing its real estate footprint, showcases the economic and operational benefits of this approach. Furthermore, employees in hybrid roles show a lower resignation rate (21%) compared to those required to RTO full-time (42%), highlighting the model’s role in enhancing employee retention.

Hybrid work also addresses the diverse preferences within the workforce, providing the face-to-face interaction desired by 74% of employees while accommodating the 62% of remote workers who resist full-time office returns. The model’s flexibility has been linked to higher job satisfaction, better work-life balance, and improved performance ratings from managers.


The debate between RTO and WFH is not a zero-sum game. The statistics and trends point towards a hybrid work model as a sustainable solution that respects employers’ needs for collaboration and culture and employees’ desires for flexibility and autonomy. As the workplace continues to evolve, hybrid models stand out as a testament to the potential for compromise and innovation in meeting the diverse needs of today’s workforce.


Recruiting redefined; built for high-tech,
high-growth teams